Connect with us

Column

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State

Published

on

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State

By Lawal Ishaq Esq.
On 29th March this year, Jos City was thrown into confusion when the forgotten ugly madness of the ethno-religious crisis reared its sad face. This time around, the trigger was a discerning bullet* shot randomly by some evil gum-wielding men; the exact number and the means of their conveyance are still not clear. This discerning bullet shot randomly was meant to kill only Christians and did, despite the undisputed fact that there were Muslim youths in the same location with the supposed targeted Christian youths.

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State.Plateau_Summary_Table  

This is the height of ridiculous lies and theories being told in Plateau State for long. It is on record that these bullets didn’t discern between Christians and Muslims, as the bullets killed both. In telling the lies, the manipulative Christian propagandists lined up some dead bodies affected by the bullets and shamelessly included the body of a Muslim victim in a red T-shirt. His people and friends identified his body from the picture the liars were circulating on social media and raised alarm that the young man is a Muslim, not a Christian, as was being falsely spread. It turned out that out of about 29 victims of the supposed discerning bullet aimed to kill only Christians, up to four Muslims fell as well. This is understandable due to the fact that the spot targeted is notorious for the congregation of wayward youths sharing and taking all sorts of hard and intoxicating drugs.

 

Despite these obvious facts, the liners and propagandists of Christians Genocide on the Plateau kept portraying the sad event of Sunday, 29th March, as a continuation of the falsely claimed Christian genocide. Let’s not forget that scores of Muslim youth, notably okada and Keke Napep operators, were ambushed, killed and their bodies either burnt to ashes or disposed of in shallow graves or thrown into the rivers of Gada Biyu, Farin Gada, Unguwar Ruiuba and many other Christian-dominated areas in Jos.

This brought the bear the lies of Christian genocide in Plateau orchestrated by Professor Joash Amuputan, the current INEC chairman, in his infamous legal brief of 2022.

No doubt lives are being lost through violent means in the Plateau every day. However, if any of the happenings of illegal life-taking in the state is going to be referred to as a genocide, then the event of 28th to 30th November 2008 in Jos was the event that is more qualified to be referred to as genocide – Muslim genocide, to put it appropriately. In three days in November 2008, over 600 Muslims were shot dead, as by the Muslim leadership in Jos and corroborated by some international human rights agencies such as Human Rights Watch.

Going a bit back to the 2001 Jos crisis, the state government-owned Commission of Inquiry set up in 2001 under Justice Niki Tobi confirmed the claim of Muslim genocide in Plateau State as well in its report.

Sadly, the Muslims don’t have the media or are not out for propaganda. As such, their mass killing is always unreported or underreported. (See a table of Muslims massacred in different incidents in Plateau with dates and figures).

I was listening to a video clip of an Islamic imam delivering a sermon last Friday in which he logically stated that it is impossible for Muslims to carry out genocide of Christians in a place like Plateau because Muslims are not only in the minority; we are highly marginalised, which incapacitated us following decades of marginalisation and neglect. Muslims are barely living in Plateau State because since the creation of the present Plateau, there has not been a single Muslim civilian governor, deputy governor, secretary to the state government or chief of staff in the state. The Imam asked, ‘How can a minority oppress the majority to the extent of committing genocide against them when they are not even close to the machinery of power? ‘ If Muslims were interested in committing any genocide against the Christians, they could have conveniently done so in places where they are the majority, like Kano or Sokoto!

It is sad that a few people are still telling their people that it is possible to have a plateau without Muslims. This is a nightmare, not a dream. As opined by some eight thinking social media content creators, the day we realise that Christians cannot chase Muslims from Plateau State and vice versa, that day will be the beginning of peaceful coexistence in the state. This fact should be repeated and carried as wide as possible so that we may have a peaceful plateau.

Enough of these lies and propaganda, please. Let’s live and let. Live!

Barr. Lawal Wrote from Jos Plateau State.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guest Column

Kebbi: Healthcare Transformation Headlining International Commendation

Published

on

By

Kebbi Mega Rally: When Masses Tell Their Story

Kebbi: Healthcare Transformation Headlining International Commendation

By Auwal Jaafar

Commendations have poured in from international partners in recognition of the healthcare transformation taking place in Kebbi state. From World Health Organization, (WHO), UNICEF, and United Nations Development Programme, Kebbi state is being celebrated for its impactful investments in primary healthcare and sustained efforts toward polio eradication in the state.

The rationale behind this thinking is that Health is wealth. And as expressions go, few have endured as long or carried as much weight. Like security and education, healthcare remains one of the most sacred obligations between the people and those who govern them. Yet, across Nigeria, that obligation has too often been treated lightly. Since Gov. Nasir Idris (Kauran Gwandu) assumed office in 2023, inheriting a healthcare system under severe strain, there has been a conscious effort to rewrite that narrative.

From crumbling facilities scattered across communities, clear symbols of neglect that reinforced Kebbi state’s poor standing in maternal and child health outcomes, to an acute shortage of personnel in critical centres, the situation was dire. But from the outset, the administration of Gov. Nasir signalled a determination to confront these realities head-on and improve access to healthcare for the people. And, not only the people, but even international partners have taken note.

The hack behind this success comes from understanding that leadership begins with acknowledging the problem. It is on record that governor Nasir did not attempt to mask the depth of the crisis. He openly spoke of hospitals where patients lay on bare floors due to a lack of beds. In hindsight, that candid admission was more than a statement, it was a declaration of intent. It underscored a commitment not to leave the sector as he met it.

That resolve was shaped by an awareness that Kebbi state’s healthcare challenges were layered rather than straightforward. At the surface was visibly decayed infrastructure. Beneath that lay a persistent shortage of trained personnel. Compounding both was the long-standing issue of poor welfare for health workers, which had weakened morale and driven some professionals out of the state. Addressing such interwoven problems required more than remedial fixes; it demanded a comprehensive, coordinated response. That is the route the administration has taken, and no wonder, Gov. Nasir is drawing commendation from development partners including the

Across Kebbi today, visible changes in health facilities reflect a sector regaining attention. Hospitals are being renovated and upgraded within the limits of available resources, but with a clear sense of urgency. In Argungu, home to the renowned UNESCO-recognised fishing festival, residents have welcomed the transformation of the General Hospital Argungu. Once a symbol of neglect, it now functions as a modern facility with improved capacity for diagnosis and treatment.

Argungu is only part of a broader effort. In Birnin Kebbi, the Sir Yahaya Memorial Hospital has undergone major rehabilitation and re-equipping, strengthening its role as a key referral centre. Similar interventions have reached the General Hospitals in Yauri and Zuru, alongside multiple primary healthcare centres spread across local government areas.

The attention to primary healthcare centres is deliberate. While tertiary institutions often dominate policy debates, the reality is that healthcare delivery in Nigeria begins at the grassroots. For many citizens, especially in rural areas, these centres are the first, and sometimes only point of access to healthcare. Strengthening them, therefore, reduces pressure on higher-level facilities and ensures that manageable conditions are treated early before becoming severe.

These combined investments are beginning to show impact. Better facilities have improved public confidence in government hospitals, and access to care in previously underserved communities is gradually expanding. The work is ongoing, but the trajectory is becoming clearer.

However, infrastructure alone cannot drive a health system. Skilled personnel remain indispensable, and this has informed the administration’s next phase of reforms. Faced with the option of relying on externally trained professionals or building local capacity, the government has opted for the latter.

A central element of this strategy is the establishment of the Kauran Gwandu College of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences in Ambursa. The institution is intended to boost the training of nurses and midwives, directly tackling workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas. By training locally, the state also improves the chances of retaining professionals who are more likely to serve within their communities.

Still, producing personnel is only part of the equation. Keeping them requires attention to welfare. In recognition of this, the administration has rolled out measures aimed at improving working conditions and stabilising the workforce.

These include enhanced remuneration, such as the payment of hazard allowances and adjustments in line with national salary standards. There has also been a renewed emphasis on timely payment of salaries and allowances, an issue that has long undermined the sector in many states. Alongside this, recruitment efforts have been intensified to close manpower gaps and ease pressure on existing staff.

Targeted incentives have also been introduced to encourage postings to rural areas, where shortages are often most severe. By making such placements more appealing, the government is working to correct imbalances in the distribution of health workers. Training and professional development programmes further support this effort, offering career growth and reducing the sense of stagnation among personnel.

All of these measures together, point to a broader understanding of the fact that healthcare reform is not just about physical infrastructure but about the people who sustain it. These include doctors, nurses, midwives, and support staff.

What is unfolding in Kebbi is therefore not a collection of isolated projects, but a coordinated push toward systemic reform. Infrastructure renewal, human capacity development, and welfare improvements are being pursued in tandem, each reinforcing the other.

Naturally, it is too early to declare complete success. The challenges facing healthcare in Kebbi, as in much of Nigeria, are deeply rooted and will require sustained commitment. Population pressures, funding limitations, and emerging health threats will continue to test the system. Even so, there is growing evidence that the groundwork for a more functional healthcare system is being deliberately laid.

Yet, all of these can easily disappear if the foundation is shattered. This can happen, especially in a political environment where continuity is often disrupted. Regardless, the early direction of reforms in Kebbi state’s health sector stands out for its clarity and structural focus but it can’t be immune to continuity challenges. The emphasis goes beyond immediate results to building a system that can endure. If maintained, these efforts could significantly reshape healthcare delivery in the state, lowering maternal and child mortality rates, improving life expectancy, and rebuilding public trust.

Sustaining these gains, however, ultimately rests on continuity. There is a compelling argument for supporting the kind of leadership offered by Gov. Nasir, the kind that is already laying a solid foundation, rather than even entertaining the empty promises of opposition leaders assuring of eldorado.

While the progress may appear gradual for now, it is a well known fact that in healthcare, even small improvements translate directly into saved lives. Hence, the risk of losing such gains under a less committed administration is immediate and real. This is where the people of Kebbi state must assume responsibility for continuity, to ensure that the progress made is not only preserved but expanded. Re-electing Gov. Nasir, in this context, offers the surest path to consolidating and fully realising the reforms already underway.

Jaafar writes from Abuja

Continue Reading

Guest Column

Kebbi Mega Rally: When Masses Tell Their Story

Published

on

By

Kebbi Mega Rally: When Masses Tell Their Story

Kebbi Mega Rally: When Masses Tell Their Story

By Ibrahim Bello

Politics, by its very nature, is a contest of narratives. The opposition thrives on casting doubt, often working overtime to diminish incumbency with sharp rhetoric and selective amnesia. But while, so many incumbents allow themselves to be distracted or drawn into street brawls by the natural antics of the opposition, some simply just show the opposition what it truly means to be accepted. This they do through the people who, having experienced governance, decide to take up the job of marketing the incumbent through organic public spectacles.

That moment played out in Birnin Kebbi, over the weekend when an overwhelming crowd of Kebbi people surged in solidarity with Governor Nasir Idris, (Kauran Gwandu), and President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. All those who witnessed that organic crowd noted that it was not just another rally; it was a referendum of sorts, staged not in ballot boxes, but in human numbers.

When people gather in such magnitude, uncoerced and spirited, they are not merely attending an event; they are testifying to what they have witnessed.

The chants were unmistakable. The placards told their own stories—roads completed, schools revived, hospitals upgraded, salaries paid, security strengthened. It was less of political theatre and more of a public audit, carried out by those who feel the impact most directly.

For Governor Nasir Idris, the significance of that moment goes beyond optics. It reflects a governance model that has deliberately focused on tangible outcomes rather than loud proclamations. Since assuming office in 2023, his administration has carved a reputation around visible development and administrative responsiveness.

Take infrastructure, for instance. Across Kebbi State, there has been a steady push to rehabilitate and construct roads linking communities that were previously cut off, especially during the rainy season. Roads such as the Argungu–Aleiro corridor and critical township roads within Birnin Kebbi have improved mobility, eased trade, and reduced travel time for residents and farmers alike. These are economic lifelines whose impact is already being felt.

In education, the primary constituency of the governor, the story is equally compelling. Governor Nasir has prioritised the renovation of dilapidated schools and the construction of new classrooms to address overcrowding. Beyond infrastructure, his administration approved the recruitment of thousands of teachers to bridge staffing gaps in public schools. This intervention is critical in a state where access to quality basic education remains a developmental challenge. By investing in both human and physical capital, Kebbi is gradually repositioning its education sector for long-term gains.

Healthcare delivery, often neglected in subnational governance, has also received notable attention. Several primary healthcare centres have been upgraded and equipped across the state, improving access to basic medical services in rural areas.

The administration has also supported general hospitals with essential equipment and personnel, strengthening the referral system. Perhaps, the most significant investment in this sector is the establishment of the Kebbi College of Nursing and Midwifery, Ambursa. The idea is to create a ready source for critical health workers to man the revamped hospitals.

Perhaps one of the most defining aspects of Governor Nasir’s leadership has been his approach to workers’ welfare.

As a former union leader, expectations were naturally high, and he has not disappointed. His administration moved early to implement the new national minimum wage, placing Kebbi among the states that acted swiftly in that regard.

Salaries have been paid consistently, pensions cleared, and gratuities addressed in a manner that restores dignity to retired civil servants.

With stories of struggling senior citizens across the country, Gov. Nasir’s commitment to doing right by retirees stands out indeed.

Security, though largely under federal control, has not been ignored. Kebbi has witnessed improved coordination between state authorities, the home grown security outfits and security agencies, particularly in border communities prone to banditry.

The government has supported logistics, mobility, and community engagement initiatives that contribute to maintaining relative peace. While challenges persist, the effort to proactively address them is evident.

Agriculture, the backbone of Kebbi’s economy, has also benefited from targeted interventions. The administration has supported farmers with inputs, improved seedlings, and extension services aimed at boosting productivity.

Given Kebbi’s status as a leading rice-producing state, these efforts are not just about food security, they are about economic stability and rural livelihoods.

What makes these interventions particularly significant is the broader fiscal context. Many governors have acknowledged that reforms initiated by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, especially around revenue and subsidy restructuring have increased allocations to states.

The real test, however, lies in utilisation. In Kebbi, there is a growing perception that these resources are being translated into visible development.

This is where the opposition’s narrative buckles under the weight of street level evidence and the lived reality of the people. Granted that criticism remains a vital component of democracy, but it must contend with evidence.

When roads are seen, when salaries are paid, when schools are functioning, and when hospitals are accessible, rhetoric alone cannot easily erase lived experience.

It’s no wonder then that the poster boy of Kebbi opposition, Abubakar Malami, was recently treated to a befitting welcome to Kebbi when youths lined the streets to chant “barawo bai mulki” loosely translated to mean thieves don’t govern.

The Birnin Kebbi rally, therefore, was not just about political endorsement; it was about validation. It demonstrated that governance, when rooted in delivery, builds its own constituency, one that is not easily swayed by transient political arguments.

Of course, no administration is without its shortcomings. There are still areas requiring urgent attention. Such areas as youth unemployment, deeper industrialisation, and expanded healthcare coverage, among others can be made better. Yet, the measure of leadership is not perfection; it is direction. And in Kebbi, the direction appears increasingly clear.

As 2027 gradually enters the political horizon, conversations will intensify. Alliances will shift, narratives will be refined, and ambitions will be declared. Yet, beneath all that, one fundamental question will persist: what has been done?

In answering that question, Governor Nasir Idris may not need an elaborate defence. The roads will speak; the schools will testify and the workers will remember. And, as witnessed in Birnin Kebbi, the people will gather, again, if necessary, to make their voices heard.

Because in the end, beyond party lines and political calculations, governance finds its truest expression in impact. And when impact resonates deeply enough, it does something no campaign strategy can manufacture; it draws a crowd that speaks not from gated mansions, but from the overall experience of governance as promised by a leader both unionist and welfarist.

Bello writes from Birnin Kebbi.

Continue Reading

Column

Ndisgonabi—Tinubu or Tinubu

Published

on

By

Ndisgonabi—Tinubu or Tinubu

Ndisgonabi—Tinubu or Tinubu

By Prince Charles Dickson, PhD

 

Bí ìtàkùn bá pa ẹnu pọ̀, wọn á mú erin so.

If creeping plants could unite, they would easily tie up an elephant.

 

Politics is full of men who confuse noise for destiny. But destiny, that slippery old masquerade, usually waits for structure, which is often established through careful planning and consensus among political leaders. In 1984, New Zealand’s Prime Minister Robert Muldoon staggered into history by calling a snap election in a visibly drunken state, hoping to ambush the opposition. The gamble backfired. He lost. In January 2009, police in Kwara, Nigeria, detained a goat after vigilantes claimed an armed robbery suspect had transformed into an animal to escape arrest. The police kept the goat but admitted they could not confirm the witchcraft scientifically. One story is about power intoxicated by its own myth. The other is about a society so burdened by superstition that absurdity can wear handcuffs. Together, they say something brutal about politics: sometimes leaders misread reality, and sometimes citizens arrest the wrong animal.

 

That is where Nigeria is drifting toward 2027. The major issue at hand is Bola Ahmed Tinubu. Not because everybody loves him. This is not due to his government’s success in solving Nigeria’s issues. But in Nigerian politics, power is not awarded to the man who is most often complained about. It awards power to the man whose enemies cannot agree on which knife to use against him. INEC has already fixed the presidential and National Assembly election for 20 February 2027, with governorship and state assembly polls on 6 March 2027. The whistle has gone. This is no longer an era of abstract outrage. It is an era of arithmetic.

 

Now, let us be fair, because fairness is not weakness. Tinubu’s administration is not walking on water. Yet it is not walking on pure failure either. The World Bank said in its April 2026 Nigeria Development Update that macroeconomic fundamentals improved through 2025 and into 2026, with the economy growing at around 4 per cent, inflation trending downward though still elevated, and gross FAAC (Federal Account Allocation Committee) revenues rising from N29.4 trillion in 2024 to N37.4 trillion in 2025. NBS says headline inflation was 15.38% in March 2026, with food inflation at 14.31%. Those are not small numbers. They suggest that some macrostabilisation is happening. However, macroeconomic indicators do not provide direct support to those in need. Revenues can rise while despair deepens. A country can look healthier in spreadsheets and sicker in the market, as the economic indicators may show growth while the actual living conditions of the population deteriorate.

 

That is the contradiction that haunts Tinubu. The poverty of statistics and the statistics of poverty are not the same thing. Government can point to improving indicators, better revenue capture, tighter monetary conditions, and reform momentum. However, citizens do not experience life through a PowerPoint presentation. The citizen lives inside transport fares, school fees, rent, market prices, and the humiliation of constant improvisation. The World Bank’s April 2026 update shows poverty at 63% in 2025, with only a gradual projected decline from 2026 onwards. That single figure represents the true opposition to the government’s narrative. It means reform may be economically coherent and politically dangerous at the same time, as it could lead to increased public unrest and opposition from those who feel threatened by the changes.

 

Then there is insecurity, the dark editor of every government boast. In just the past weeks and months, Reuters and AP have reported major bandit abductions in Zamfara, deadly retaliatory attacks in Katsina, mass killings in parts of Kwara and Katsina earlier this year, and the abduction of students in Benue. Reuters also noted today, 22 April 2026, that Tinubu’s government is tightening internal security amid economic strain, heightened militant attacks in the north, and political friction. This situation is the administration’s greatest vulnerability. Citizens may forgive hardship if they feel protected. They rarely forgive hardship and fear in one package, as this combination often leads to a deep sense of betrayal and distrust in leadership.

 

And yet, here is the wicked truth: Tinubu can still win again.

 

He can win not because he has conquered suffering, but because the opposition may still be auditioning for tragedy, as they struggle to present a compelling alternative to the ruling party’s narrative and fail to effectively mobilise their base. Key opposition leaders formed a coalition around the ADC precisely because they understood the central lesson of Nigerian electoral history: only a united opposition can seriously threaten an entrenched ruling machine. Unity is not decoration. It is oxygen. Atiku has signalled his intention to run for office in 2027. This issue matters because every opposition conversation still has one stubborn ghost inside it: ambition.

 

This is where the North becomes a significant issue. Atiku remains familiar, networked, seasoned, and deeply legible to elite politics. But familiarity can curdle into fatigue. There is a suspicion around him in some quarters, not always ideological, often emotional: the feeling that he is forever arriving at the national bus stop with one more ticket, one more coalition, one more final attempt. That is not a polling number. It is a political mood, and moods matter.

 

Another more profound question is whether the North is willing to do an ‘Obi’, meaning not merely to tolerate Peter Obi as a southern protest vessel but to actively invest in him as a viable national instrument. That would require a leap from grievance to calculation, from sympathy to strategy. It would require sections of northern politics to decide that electability is now broader than old rotation habits, old patronage circuits, and old distrusts. That leap is possible. It is not yet proven.

 

The argument surrounding Obi himself is lazy at both extremes. His admirers often speak as though moral clarity is already a governing blueprint. His critics often speak as though he is made only of emotion and internet incense. Both positions are unserious. Obi’s 2023 rise was real because he converted public anger into a disciplined symbolic movement, and Reuters captured that early when it described his effort to harness Nigerians’ frustration with the status quo. But symbolism is not the same as statecraft. To do better than Tinubu, Obi would need more than clean optics and crowd voltage. He would need a tougher party architecture, stronger northern penetration, better elite bargaining, vote protection capacity, and a clearer answer to the old Nigerian riddle: how do you move from inspiration to enforcement? In other words, he can be more than emotion, but he has not yet fully proved the machine.

 

That brings me to Ndisgonabi. I first heard it in that playful, fatalistic exchange between my beloved friend Nima and her sister NG at an amala joint. One would say, ‘Ndisgonabi’. The other would answer, ‘It’s going to be.’ Then I too started echoing it: Ndisgonabi. Gonna be. It sounded funny, warm, and unserious. But like most street philosophy, it concealed a dangerous edge beneath its surface. Ndisgonabi is what people say when they are tired of pretending control. It is our local remix of “what will be, will be.” It is also, in politics, a dangerous narcotic.

 

Once citizens start saying ‘Ndisgonabi’ in relation to power, they have already surrendered the republic.

 

No, what is destined to happen is not always predetermined. Sometimes the future is determined by what has already been organised. Tinubu’s fate is not floating in the sky like a divine meme. It is being negotiated on the ground by insecurity, inflation, incumbency, elite bargains, northern calculations, opposition ego, media climate, and public exhaustion. If the creeping plants stay scattered, the elephant walks through the farm and calls it democracy. If Atiku quits his indecisiveness, Obi prioritises strategy over sentiment, the North prioritises interest over habit, and the opposition values unity over vanity, then Tinubu can lose.

 

Until then, Ndisgonabi may simply mean this: Tinubu or Tinubu—may Nigeria win!

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025. Northeast Magazine, All Right Reserved..