Connect with us

Column

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State

Published

on

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State

By Lawal Ishaq Esq.
On 29th March this year, Jos City was thrown into confusion when the forgotten ugly madness of the ethno-religious crisis reared its sad face. This time around, the trigger was a discerning bullet* shot randomly by some evil gum-wielding men; the exact number and the means of their conveyance are still not clear. This discerning bullet shot randomly was meant to kill only Christians and did, despite the undisputed fact that there were Muslim youths in the same location with the supposed targeted Christian youths.

A Discerning Bullet & The Fallacy of Christian Genocide in Plateau State.Plateau_Summary_Table  

This is the height of ridiculous lies and theories being told in Plateau State for long. It is on record that these bullets didn’t discern between Christians and Muslims, as the bullets killed both. In telling the lies, the manipulative Christian propagandists lined up some dead bodies affected by the bullets and shamelessly included the body of a Muslim victim in a red T-shirt. His people and friends identified his body from the picture the liars were circulating on social media and raised alarm that the young man is a Muslim, not a Christian, as was being falsely spread. It turned out that out of about 29 victims of the supposed discerning bullet aimed to kill only Christians, up to four Muslims fell as well. This is understandable due to the fact that the spot targeted is notorious for the congregation of wayward youths sharing and taking all sorts of hard and intoxicating drugs.

 

Despite these obvious facts, the liners and propagandists of Christians Genocide on the Plateau kept portraying the sad event of Sunday, 29th March, as a continuation of the falsely claimed Christian genocide. Let’s not forget that scores of Muslim youth, notably okada and Keke Napep operators, were ambushed, killed and their bodies either burnt to ashes or disposed of in shallow graves or thrown into the rivers of Gada Biyu, Farin Gada, Unguwar Ruiuba and many other Christian-dominated areas in Jos.

This brought the bear the lies of Christian genocide in Plateau orchestrated by Professor Joash Amuputan, the current INEC chairman, in his infamous legal brief of 2022.

No doubt lives are being lost through violent means in the Plateau every day. However, if any of the happenings of illegal life-taking in the state is going to be referred to as a genocide, then the event of 28th to 30th November 2008 in Jos was the event that is more qualified to be referred to as genocide – Muslim genocide, to put it appropriately. In three days in November 2008, over 600 Muslims were shot dead, as by the Muslim leadership in Jos and corroborated by some international human rights agencies such as Human Rights Watch.

Going a bit back to the 2001 Jos crisis, the state government-owned Commission of Inquiry set up in 2001 under Justice Niki Tobi confirmed the claim of Muslim genocide in Plateau State as well in its report.

Sadly, the Muslims don’t have the media or are not out for propaganda. As such, their mass killing is always unreported or underreported. (See a table of Muslims massacred in different incidents in Plateau with dates and figures).

I was listening to a video clip of an Islamic imam delivering a sermon last Friday in which he logically stated that it is impossible for Muslims to carry out genocide of Christians in a place like Plateau because Muslims are not only in the minority; we are highly marginalised, which incapacitated us following decades of marginalisation and neglect. Muslims are barely living in Plateau State because since the creation of the present Plateau, there has not been a single Muslim civilian governor, deputy governor, secretary to the state government or chief of staff in the state. The Imam asked, ‘How can a minority oppress the majority to the extent of committing genocide against them when they are not even close to the machinery of power? ‘ If Muslims were interested in committing any genocide against the Christians, they could have conveniently done so in places where they are the majority, like Kano or Sokoto!

It is sad that a few people are still telling their people that it is possible to have a plateau without Muslims. This is a nightmare, not a dream. As opined by some eight thinking social media content creators, the day we realise that Christians cannot chase Muslims from Plateau State and vice versa, that day will be the beginning of peaceful coexistence in the state. This fact should be repeated and carried as wide as possible so that we may have a peaceful plateau.

Enough of these lies and propaganda, please. Let’s live and let. Live!

Barr. Lawal Wrote from Jos Plateau State.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Guest Column

Local Government Autonomy: Nigeria’s Missing Weapon Against Insecurity and Banditry

Published

on

By

Local Government Autonomy: Nigeria’s Missing Weapon Against Insecurity and Banditry

Local Government Autonomy: Nigeria’s Missing Weapon Against Insecurity and Banditry

By Aishatu Kabu
Following my recent article titled Cashless Policy: Our Most Underused Weapon Against Banditry, I am impressed by the debate it generated. Many people argue that the policy alone is not enough to end banditry. I agree with them; my post does not claim the policy will fully address banditry, but it will weaken the value chain.
Nigeria’s security issues are complex, which is why the government has always preached a non-kinetic approach as an alternative even when the majority are in disagreement with the government.
Perhaps one of the issues government should ponder and reflect upon is local government autonomy, because the average Nigerian believes that insecurity is a governance failure. But is insecurity a governance failure? Yes, and here is why:
Local government in Nigeria is practically non-existent today. A tier constitutionally designed to be autonomous has been reduced to an appendage of state governors, making essential basic amenities difficult to reach the grassroots.
In Nigeria, a ward councillor in the early 4th Republic had more room to deliver than most LG chairmen do today. They could fix a borehole or grade a road without waiting months for Government House approval. When last did you witness your local government chairman executing a township road network, constructing healthcare facilities, or building dispensaries or schools? If the answer is no, then are Nigerian LGs independent institutions, or just conduits for states to spend public funds without accountability?
Nigerians first celebrated Federal High Court rulings under President Buhari declaring joint accounts illegal. The victory was sealed on July 11, 2024, when the Supreme Court in Attorney General of the Federation v. Attorney General of Abia State & 35 Others ordered that the 774 LGs must receive allocations directly from the Federation Account, declaring state control of LG funds unconstitutional.
This struggle is not new. Since 1999, civil society, labour unions, and LG chairmen have fought to free the third tier from state capture. Every president from Obasanjo to Jonathan to Buhari promised “true autonomy” but left office with the joint account system intact. The July 2024 judgement is only the latest chapter in a decades-long battle to make the Constitution’s promise of LG autonomy real.
But have LGs become autonomous to date? Look at how they operate in your state. Are they free from interference and micromanagement? The answer is no. What do you think could have been the issue?
In my opinion, court judgements are not enough. If we want lasting peace in Nigeria, we must institutionalise autonomy. Local governments must be empowered to take charge of their administration and deliver good governance, being the closest to the people tier of government. The core problem is simple: as long as governors control LG elections through State Independent Electoral Commissions, LG chairmen will remain loyal to Government House, not to the Constitution or their people.
If the federal government cannot take over LG elections due to constitutional limits, then President Tinubu must use political will differently. He should partner directly with civil society and grassroots Nigerians.
He can create a “Nigeria Participatory Democracy Fund” to empower CSOs like Yiaga Africa, ActionAid Nigeria, Connected Development, and BudgIT to train 100 young citizens per LG area to track LG funds and projects. That’s 77,400 citizen monitors nationwide.
This matters because accountability at the LG level is almost zero. Yet LGs received ₦4.1 trillion in FAAC allocations between Jan 2023 and Dec 2024, according to NEITI and BudgIT data. But communities see little benefit from it. Banditry thrives, insecurity continues to remain a sustainable business model, citizens live in fear, vulnerability increases, and poverty becomes a normalised way of life. If local governments were allowed to use their resources judiciously, ₦4.1 trillion in FAAC allocation in two years is enough to address some basic community problems today. Even smaller things like addressing out-of-school children that merely have to do with the community are not addressed by local government. They are waiting for the state to provide them directives on what to do and how to do it. Where is the autonomy in this?
Some may argue that local government administrators aren’t angels. They are products of the same political systems that produced governors; therefore, even when they receive autonomy, nothing will change. But wait, autonomy can be accompanied by transparency, citizen oversight, and stronger financial management systems to ensure resources translate into better services.
This argument is not to attack anyone. For Nigeria to work and address insecurity, LGs must control and spend their resources for their people. That will reduce poverty, create jobs, and address the insecurity that thrives where government is absent. Banditry is a local problem that requires a local solution, just as terrorism cannot be defeated from Abuja while it operates in forests. States also can’t fix grassroots issues and problems.
Autonomous LGs can fund vigilantes, fix feeder roads, and light up villages in weeks because they have only their local government to think for, not the entire state. When power and money reach the grassroots, communities gain the capacity to protect themselves instead of waiting for rescue and direction from the governor on what to do and how to do it. Governors don’t understand community issues better than the local government chairman.
Local government autonomy is not merely a constitutional issue; it is a development imperative. If Nigeria is serious about addressing insecurity, reducing poverty, improving basic services, and strengthening democracy, power and resources must genuinely reach the grassroots.
Until we fix LG autonomy to address governance failures, every other policy remains treating symptoms while the disease kills our communities.
Aishatu Kabu
writes from Maiduguri,
Borno State.

Continue Reading

Striking the Balance

It’s Time We Invite the U.S. to Set Up a Military Base in Nigeria

Published

on

By

It's Time We Invite the U.S. to Set Up a Military Base in Nigeria

It’s Time We Invite the U.S. to Set Up a Military Base in Nigeria. 

 By MS Abubakar, PhD, CAS

“Niger chose anger. Mali chose Wagner. Nigeria must choose a strategy.”

As a Northerner, I must confess a contradiction. When French and U.S. troops withdrew from Niger Republic in 2024, I celebrated on my street in Abuja. Like millions across West Africa, I had condemned the idea of a new foreign base in Northern Nigeria. My fears were not invented. They were fed by a powerful narrative: that France, in particular, orchestrates instability in the Sahel to protect uranium interests and CFA franc dominance. In Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali, the junta and the youth believe France sponsors or tolerates jihadists to justify its presence. I believed it too.

But conviction without evidence is dangerous. So, I asked harder questions.

1. The “Foreign Base = Instability” Myth Doesn’t Hold Up

America operates over 700 military facilities worldwide. In Africa alone it has Camp Lemonnier in Djibouti, bases in Kenya, Ghana, and drone operations in Niger before 2024. Did Kenya become a failed state? Did Ghana lose its democracy? No. In fact, Ghana ranks higher than Nigeria on the Global Peace Index and Human Development Index. Kenya, despite Al-Shabaab threats, has maintained state capacity and elections.

The common factor is not the base. It is governance. Where institutions are strong, foreign security cooperation is managed. Where institutions are weak, any presence—French, Russian, or American—becomes a political football.

2. Our Problem is Structural, Not Foreign. 

Banditry in Zamfara, Boko Haram in Borno, ISWAP in Lake Chad, and kidnapping along the Abuja-Kaduna corridor are not imported problems. They are Nigerian problems with Nigerian roots: endemic poverty, where 63% live in multidimensional poverty per NBS, exclusion of rural communities from basic services, low HDI, ungoverned spaces, and porous borders the size of Western Europe.

No foreign soldier can fix bad governance. But a foreign base with ISR drones, satellite intelligence, and logistics can degrade the killers while we fix the system. That is the distinction I missed in 2024.

3. The Wagner Experiment in Mali Proved the Point 

After expelling France, Mali invited Russia’s Wagner Group. Three years later, attacks increased, 300+ civilians were killed in Moura, and Wagner became accused of human rights abuses. If Russia had the capacity to stabilise the Sahel, Mali would be proof. It is not.

America brings something different: not just guns, but integrated intelligence, airlift, MEDEVAC, and training. The U.S. Africa Command’s “by, with, and through” doctrine means they build local capacity. That is what Nigeria needs now.

4. Our Military is Brave, But Overstretched 

I say these words with respect: the Nigerian Armed Forces are arguably the third most powerful in Africa. Our soldiers have fought in ECOMOG, Sudan, and Somalia and against Boko Haram for 15 years. Their courage is legendary.

“Courage without equipment is martyrdom. Our soldiers deserve partners, not just praise.”

But courage without equipment is martyrdom. We have lost senior, serving, and retired officers—generals and colonels—to ambushes and IEDs. That tells you the enemy has better ISR and night-fighting capacity in some theaters. Our air force flies sorties, but lacks persistent drone coverage. Our army clears territory but cannot “hold” due to logistics gaps. A U.S. base can fill those specific gaps without commanding our troops.

5. Sovereignty is Negotiated, Not Surrendered 

The fear of “neo-colonialism” is valid. But sovereignty is not an all-or-nothing idea. Japan hosts U.S. bases yet remains sovereign and industrialized. Germany does too. The key is a Status of Forces Agreement negotiated by Nigerians, for Nigerians. Terms can include: Nigerian command over operations, no unilateral raids, joint patrols only, technology transfer, and mandatory training of NAF and NA personnel.

“Sovereignty is negotiated, not surrendered. A base is a lease, not an occupation.”

A base is not an occupation. It is a lease. We lease land to MTN and Airtel. We can lease a corner of the north to a partner who helps us kill terrorists faster.

6. There Are Economic and Strategic Upsides 

Beyond security, a U.S. base means infrastructure: better airstrips, hospitals, roads, and skilled jobs for locals. It means Nigeria becomes a hub for Sahel intelligence. That raises our diplomatic weight in ECOWAS and the AU. Currently, after Niger’s exit, the U.S. is looking for a reliable anchor state in the region. Why shouldn’t that be Nigeria?

The Call 

I was wrong in 2024. Expelling partners did not bring peace to the Sahel. It created vacuums. Nigeria cannot afford a vacuum.

So, I am calling on fellow Nigerians, especially Northerners like me, to reconsider. Let us pressure the National Assembly and the presidency to open talks with Washington on a limited, transparent US military presence. Let us demand oversight, not rejection.

The Sahel is burning. Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali chose anger. Nigeria must choose strategy.

We should let the U.S. set up a military base in Nigeria to end the bloodshed, not because we’re weak.

Nigeria must not bleed alone when help is available.

Continue Reading

Guest Column

Sokoto: Gov. Aliyu’s New Harvest Of Projects

Published

on

By

Sokoto: Gov. Aliyu's New Harvest Of Projects

Sokoto: Gov. Aliyu’s New Harvest Of Projects

 

By Umar Yusuf

 

In politics, some leaders discuss their plans, while others quietly get to work. The latter category often allows projects and results to speak louder than press statements, political advertisements and endless public relations exercises.

 

Since the emergence of the Governor Ahmed Aliyu-led administration, commissioning ceremonies—whether for completed projects or the flag-off of new ones—have become a recurring feature of governance in Sokoto State. As the state once again enters another round of project commissioning activities this June, it becomes increasingly clear that Governor Ahmed Aliyu Sokoto is determined to reinforce a governing philosophy that has become synonymous with his administration: promises made must be pursued and delivered.

 

The ceremonies scheduled across different parts of the state are not isolated events. These ceremonies are part of a broader continuum of infrastructural renewal that has defined the administration since Governor Aliyu assumed office nearly three years ago.

 

To appreciate the significance of the projects currently being commissioned, one must first recall the circumstances under which the present administration came into office.

 

At the time Governor Aliyu took over the reins of leadership, many sectors of public life in Sokoto State required urgent intervention. Concerns exist across education, healthcare, transportation, housing, and rural development. Yet perhaps no challenge was as visible and as painful to ordinary citizens as the crisis surrounding potable water supply.

 

For many residents of the Sokoto metropolis and surrounding communities, access to water had become both difficult and expensive. Families spent considerable portions of their income purchasing water from vendors. What should ordinarily have been a basic social service had become a daily struggle.

 

Recognising the importance of water for public welfare, Governor Aliyu moved swiftly. He showed from the onset that he had no intention of treating water scarcity as a routine administrative challenge. To his government, water was an emergency requiring immediate and sustained intervention.

 

Massive investments were directed toward the rehabilitation and expansion of water schemes throughout the state. Ageing facilities were revived, abandoned projects were revisited, and new infrastructure was introduced to improve distribution. Projects such as the rehabilitation of the Old Airport Water Scheme, the Tamaje Water Scheme, and other strategic water facilities helped restore supplies to many communities that had endured years of shortages.

 

Today, even critics of the administration acknowledge the significant improvements in the water situation compared to previous conditions. The turnaround has not only reduced hardship for residents but has also restored confidence in the government’s capacity to respond effectively to public needs.

 

Water, however, represents only one chapter of a much broader story.

 

Over the last three years, the Ahmed Aliyu administration has embarked on an ambitious program of infrastructural development that touches virtually every sector of governance. Across the state, roads such as the Mabera-Mani Road, the Gawon Nama Axis, and several township roads have been constructed or rehabilitated, improving mobility and commercial activities.

 

Healthcare: Hospitals and primary care centres have received upgrades, equipment, and rehabilitation work aimed at improving service delivery. Educational institutions have similarly benefited from renovation projects, the provision of learning facilities, and investments intended to improve the learning environment.

 

The administration has also pursued housing projects, including the ongoing construction of hundreds of housing units for civil servants and vulnerable groups. Agricultural support programmes, youth empowerment initiatives and interventions targeted at stimulating local economic activities have equally featured prominently within the government’s development agenda.

 

What is perhaps most remarkable is the geographical spread of these interventions. Rather than concentrating development exclusively within the Sokoto metropolis, the government has consistently sought to extend projects into local government areas and rural communities.

 

This approach reflects an understanding that development is meaningful only when it reaches the people wherever they reside.

 

It is against this backdrop that the current round of commissioning activities should be viewed.

 

Last Friday’s commissioning of the Illela Jumu’at Mosque was more than a ceremonial event. It also provided an opportunity to reflect on the administration’s third anniversary and the progress recorded thus far.

 

The choice of Illela itself is significant. Situated along the border corridor, the town occupies an important position within the state’s commercial and social landscape. Investments in the area therefore carry implications not only for local residents but also for regional economic activities and cross-border trade.

 

Today, attention shifts to another important milestone with the commissioning of 100 housing units for internally displaced individuals in Illela Local Government Area.

 

At a time when insecurity has displaced thousands of citizens across different parts of Northern Nigeria, housing interventions targeted at vulnerable populations deserve recognition.

 

Providing shelter is not merely about constructing buildings. It’s about restoring dignity, rebuilding lives and creating conditions for displaced families to start over.

 

The decision to invite Professor Babagana Umara Zulum, Governor of Borno State, to perform the commissioning is equally symbolic.

 

Governor Zulum has earned national recognition for his commitment to rebuilding communities affected by insurgency. His participation underscores the importance of collaborative approaches to addressing displacement and humanitarian challenges.

 

Beyond the housing project, Professor Zulum will also perform the foundation-laying ceremony for the Illela International Market.

 

This project may ultimately prove to be one of the most economically consequential initiatives of the administration.

 

Markets are more than places where goods exchange hands. They are engines of local economies. They create jobs, stimulate investments, attract traders, and expand commercial opportunities in their surrounding communities.

 

Given Illela’s strategic location as a gateway community to the Republic of Niger, an ultramodern international market possesses the potential to transform trade activities while strengthening Sokoto State’s position within regional commerce. The benefits could extend far beyond local government boundaries.

 

The following day will witness another housing initiative in Rabah Local Government Area, where the foundation stone for an additional 100 housing units for internally displaced individuals will be laid.

 

The project demonstrates that the administration’s housing interventions are components of a wider policy framework aimed at social welfare, community rehabilitation and inclusive development.

 

Then comes the commissioning of the Mana Water Scheme on June 18, to be performed by the governor of Kano State, Abba Kabir Yusuf.

 

For some observers, the commissioning of another water project may appear routine. In reality, it is anything but routine when viewed against the backdrop of the severe water challenges that existed before Governor Aliyu assumed office.

 

Water remains one of the clearest indicators of governmental responsiveness. Every new scheme commissioned translates into reduced hardship for households, improved sanitation, better public health outcomes and enhanced economic productivity.

 

The Mana Water Scheme therefore represents another important step in consolidating gains already recorded within the sector.

 

The commissioning activities reveal that tangible outcomes ultimately measure governance.

 

Political speeches have their place. Campaign promises are necessary. But nothing can substitute for concrete impact, measured in flowing taps, functional roads, improved hospitals, modern schools, housing estates, and thriving markets.

 

These are the parameters through which citizens eventually judge governments. It’s ultimately about what people can see, touch and benefit from.

 

A road either exists or it does not. Again, a water scheme either supplies water or it fails to supply water. The same applies to housing estates, hospitals, schools, markets, and countless other public assets.

 

In this regard, the Aliyu administration appears determined to ensure that its record is defined by visible interventions rather than abstract promises.

 

Naturally, no government is beyond criticism. Challenges remain and expectations continue to rise. There are sectors where citizens still demand faster progress and broader interventions. Such demands are legitimate in every democratic society. However, it is also crucial to recognise and acknowledge progress whenever it occurs.

 

The projects being commissioned across Sokoto State this week provide further evidence that the administration continues to invest in infrastructure, social welfare, and economic development. More importantly, they demonstrate consistency in governance priorities rather than the abandonment of campaign commitments.

 

As the commissioning ceremonies unfold, they collectively represent something larger than individual projects scattered across different local government areas.

 

They represent the harvest of deliberate planning, sustained investment and a governing philosophy anchored on delivering visible benefits to the people.

 

For Governor Ahmed Aliyu Sokoto, this season of commissioning is therefore not merely a celebration of completed projects. It is a reminder that development is a continuous journey and that the true measure of leadership lies not in promises made but in promises fulfilled.

 

Umar writes from Sokoto.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025. Northeast Magazine, All Right Reserved..